Original Work of Mary Schweitzer: Back in , Dr. There were also intact blood vessels and individual dinosaur cells. Beyond this, there were intact original dinosaur proteins as well as evidence of fragments of DNA that were discovered sometime later in Link. The evidence of DNA fragments is particularly interesting. Each antibody binds dinosaur cells in patterns similar to extant cells. These data are the first to support preservation of multiple proteins and to present multiple lines of evidence for material consistent with DNA in dinosaurs, supporting the hypothesis that these structures were part of the once living animals. So, now there is clear evidence of not only intact dinosaur soft tissues and cellular structures, but subcellular structures, sequenceable proteins and even sizable fragments of DNA see image below. After all, there was very good scientific evidence in hand that soft tissues decay fairly rapidly over time so that protein and DNA sequences cannot remain intact, at ambient temperatures, longer than a few tens of thousands of years.

How accurate are Carbon-14 and other radioactive dating methods?

Married Paul of Eugene OR said: But the modifications were not very much – 1 or 2 percent. It is good to hear an acknowledgment of contrary facts from one who disagrees with me.

Your main claim regarding C14 in fossils is contamination – the reason they find C14 in dinosaur bones is contamination. Isn’t it convenient that all dinosaur bones with C14 are contaminated, but none of the samples “widely used by the oil/gas/mining industries” (from your #1 point) are never contaminated?

Criticisms of Stratigraphy, Dendrochronology, and C dating methods Criticisms of C dating methods The methods used to discover the presence of Carbon C as a means for dating are suspect as that atomic element is subject to environmental influence, including the fall-out from nuclear explosions and extra-planetary impact. The purpose for this page is to provide a database of dissenting information concerning C dating, most prominently testing of soft-tissue collected from Dinosaur fossils.

This page has articles skeptical of Carbon dating methods, and an article in defense of the method. Secular historians need not debate religious merit, but to accommodate for the discrepancies in Carbon dating, as this helps sustains the exploration of a new narrative model that may be yet free of conflicting religiously ideological tendencies. A question to sum it all up: Carbon dating is the standard method used by scientists to determine the age of certain fossilized remains.

As scientists will often claim something to be millions or billions of years old ages that do not conform to the Biblical account of the age of the earth , Christians are often left wondering about the accuracy of the carbon method. Carbon is an unstable, radioactive isotope of carbon As with any radioactive isotope, carbon decays over time. The half-life of carbon 14 is approximate 5, years.

That means if you took one pound of percent carbon , in 5, years, you would only have half a pound left. Carbon is created in the upper atmosphere as nitrogen atoms are bombarded by cosmic radiation. For every one trillion carbon atoms, you will find one carbon atoms. The carbon that results from the reaction caused by cosmic radiation quickly changes to carbon dioxide, just like normal carbon would.

How Carbon-14 Dating Works

Senior research scientist Alexander Cherkinsky specializes in the preparation of samples for Carbon testing. He directed the pretreatment and processing of the dinosaur bone samples with the Accelerator Mass Spectrometer, though he did not know the bones were from dinosaurs, and he signed the reports. Carbon dating at this facility is certainly the very best. But in , someone told the director of the facility, Jeff Speakman, that the Paleochronology group was showing the Carbon reports on a website and YouTube and drawing the obvious conclusions.

So when he received another bone sample from the Paleochronology group, he returned it to sender and sent an email saying: The scientists at CAIS and I are dismayed by the claims that you and your team have made with respect to the age of the Earth and the validity of biological evolution.

c dating of dinosaur bones. Today, most scientists are working within a false paradigm of earth’s history which holds that all living things have evolved through the same kinds of material processes going on today over hundreds of millions of years.

He had investigated the extraordinary claims that had been first presented in Alternative 3, an episode of a British television documentary series called Science Report, which aired on June 20, Alternative 3 The Alternative 3 television show described how the deterioration of global environmental conditions had led to the major powers, US and USSR, secretly collaborating behind the scenes to ensure survival of the human species.

This included Watkins whose investigation uncovered more information that led him to writing the book, Alternative 3. For obvious reasons, we cannot reveal the identity of Trojan. Nor can we give any hint about his function or status in the operation. We are completely satisfied, however, that his credentials are authentic and that, in breaking his oath of silence, he is prompted by the most honourable of motives.

Watkins described two categories of people being taken to Mars according to Trojan: These professionals, we have now established, have been classifying people selected for the Alternative 3 operation into two categories: He gave as an example a small group of 20 individuals who were forcibly taken there:

Updating The Theory of the Earth

Answer this question How does Carbon dating work? Why do we know the Dinosaurs are over 65 million years old? Just look it up on google. There are about two dozen methods of radiometric dating in use and some are more appropriate for some objects than others.

* Studies Carbon Dating Mosasaur and Dinosaur Bones: Saving RSR a lot of money, including in connection with soft tissue, scientists have begun reporting carbon dating of Mesozoic-layer (not era) fossil bones.

Carbon C dating of multiple samples of bone from 8 dinosaurs found in Texas, Alaska, Colorado, and Montana revealed that they are only 22, to 39, years old. Since dinosaurs are thought to be over 65 million years old, the news is stunning – and more than some can tolerate. After the AOGS-AGU conference in Singapore, the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the findings. Unwilling to challenge the data openly, they erased the report from public view without a word to the authors.

When the authors inquired, they received this letter: They did not look at the data and they never spoke with the researchers. They did not like the test results, so they censored them. Carbon is considered to be a highly reliable dating technique. It’s accuracy has been verified by using C to date artifacts whose age is known historically.

William Lane Craig’s intellectually dishonest attack on biblical creationists

Almost all paleontologists never date dinosaur bones, because they have assumed for some time that the bones have to be millions of years old. True science is all about measurement and verification of the assumptions underlying each old theory in order to improve or replace outdated ideas. Scientific methods and instrumentation have greatly improved since the earlier days of dinosaur dating, and those old assumptions are now being tested.

Indeed, many dinosaur fossils have been carbon-dated in recent years, with surprising results.

Which is why we don’t use C14 dating on dinosaur bones. Other methods of dating are more appropriate. What is happening, is that you are saying that because you are using a crescent wrench to hammer nails into a 2×4 doesn’t work very well therefore it is impossible to hammer nails into the wall.

They will not allow others to date bones in their possession! Our Paleo team has Carbon 14 dated dinosaur bones from Texas, Colorado, Montana, China, North Dakota, and Alaska by professional labs using accelerator mass spectrometry. Every sample dates to between 23, and 39, years before the present. Did Asteroids kill the dinosaurs? When did Asteroids hit. See below and on our Carbon 14 dating page. Not only has dinosaur blood blood vessels, and collagen been found and confirmed by the whole scientific community, now fragments of collagen and iron rich proteins have been found within the walls of blood vessels.

Scientists descrribe it as a “startling find” especially since the dinosaur bone it was found in was reported to be million years old. Dinosaur organic matter found Imagine the impossibility of a dinosaur bone not turning to stone, not decaying and crumbling to dust and the contents inside the bone surviving. What is involved would be million years of summer, winter, rain, snow, droughts, floods, earthquakes, crustal movement, perhaps a million or more of these events and yet this bone with its organic matter is still there.

A few years ago scientists worldwide agreed that no organic material could ever survive beyond thousands of years. There are two possibilities here to explain what is happening. One explanation is that somehow organic matter truly survives millions of years and we did not know it. The other more reasonable explanation is that these bones are not million years old and that the method used to determine that million year age is flawed.

Did Humans Walk the Earth with Dinosaurs? Triceratops Horn Dated to 33,500 Years

Tweet NaturalNews A recent archaeological discovery that throws a wrench into the conventional theory of evolution has reportedly cost a California professor his job. Mark Armitage, a former scientist at California State University, Northridge CSUN , was reportedly fired after claiming to have unearthed a dinosaur fossil that still contains soft, flexible tissue, suggesting that it can’t be millions of years old.

A year veteran in his field, Armitage has published many studies over the years in peer-reviewed journals. One of his most recent was published last July, pertaining to a discovery he made at the Hell Creek Formation excavation site in Montana. According to The Christian Post, Armitage was evaluating a triceratops horn fossil when he came across preserved soft tissue. A lawsuit recently filed in Armitage’s defense describes his reaction to the discovery as “fascinated,” since flexible matter has never before been discovered on a dinosaur fossil.

Carbon dating dinosaur bones AOGS dating 9 years older man names C14 dating dinosaurs The misconception that I will be covering today is that the age of dinosaur fossils is The way that carbon dating works is that while an organism is alive, the Aug 6, Professor Fired for Discovering Dinosaur Only 4, Years Old with the.

The deposit in which the Tyrannosaurus rex fossil was found is dated at 70 million years. Not only were blood cells found, but soft and pliable tissue as well, including flexible blood vessels. Paleontologist Mary Schweitzer, who made the discovery in Montana, exclaimed: Kenisaw Landis Soft and pliable tissue only after it was soaked in an acidic bath and minerals removed. It was fossilized… Bill Huningahke Your wrong on all accounts … see creation. But nice job trying to redirect.

Radiocarbon dating works quite well even matches across multiple types. I do continue to find it interesting that you quote large amounts of text without a reference. Is it Dahmer et al. Is it Dahmer et al ? Kline They have Found C14 in Diamonds.

C-14 Dating of Dinosaur Bones

Senior research scientist Alexander Cherkinsky specializes in the preparation of samples for Carbon testing. He directed the pretreatment and processing of the dinosaur bone samples with the Accelerator Mass Spectrometer, though he did not know the bones were from dinosaurs, and he signed the reports. Carbon dating at this facility is certainly the very best. But in , someone told the director of the facility, Jeff Speakman, that the Paleochronology group was showing the Carbon reports on a website and YouTube and drawing the obvious conclusions.

So when he received another bone sample from the Paleochronology group, he returned it to sender and sent an email saying: The scientists at CAIS and I are dismayed by the claims that you and your team have made with respect to the age of the Earth and the validity of biological evolution.

Feb 14,  · Radiocarbon dating of dinosaur bones, accounts from ancient histories, depictions on rocks, mozaics, and temple walls; and human footprints with dinosaurs strongly show that dinosaurs were around in historical times.

McMurtry is not listed on their web site as a notable graduate although eleven astronauts and many scientists are! This is part of the State University of New York, an umbrella for various institutions in New York state mainly providing vocational qualifications. The College of Environmental Science based in Syracuse concentrates on forestry and related areas. Current MS degrees from this school are taught degrees and not research based. It is unclear how much research was involved in his MS.

His masters degree thesis was entitled “The Redwood National Park: Dr McMurtry has stated in interviews that it is a doctorate in Christian apolagetics.

Carbon-14, DNA & Soft Tissue in Dinosaur Bone: Evidence for a Young Earth